Document icon

Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures

Description

Background

In August 2015, the IASB published a Request for Views: 2015 Agenda Consultation. Some respondents suggested that the IASB consider permitting subsidiaries to apply IFRS Standards with reduced disclosures. This approach would reduce costs, without removing information needed by the users of the subsidiaries’ financial statements. 

The IASB added a research project to its pipeline in March 2016 and it became active in March 2019. The research project assessed whether it would be feasible to permit subsidiaries that are SMEs to apply the recognition and measurement requirements of IFRS Standards and the disclosure requirements of the IFRS for SMEs Standard with minimal tailoring of those disclosure requirements.

The IASB recognised that the disclosure requirements of the IFRS for SMEs Standard would need to be tailored to reflect differences in the recognition and measurement requirements between IFRS Standards and the IFRS for SMEs Standard. However, the IASB wished to keep the tailoring to a minimum.

The IASB discussed the research results at its meetings between September and December 2019. At its meeting on 28 January 2020 the IASB decided to move the Subsidiaries that are SMEs project from the research programme to the standard-setting programme.

Between October 2020 and January 2021 the IASB discussed issues that were identified during the preparation and review of the analysis and suggested disclosure requirements.

IASB Exposure Draft Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures

On 26 July 2021 the IASB published the Exposure Draft Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures. The objective is to develop a reduced-disclosure IFRS Standard that would apply on a voluntary basis to subsidiaries without public accountability. The reduced-disclosure IFRS Standard would be part of full IFRS Standards and subject to endorsement in the European Union.

EFRAG Draft Comment Letter

On 30 September 2021, EFRAG published its Draft Comment Letter. In its Draft Comment Letter, EFRAG welcomes the IASB’s efforts in developing reduced disclosure requirements for subsidiaries without public accountability and cautiously supports the proposed scope of the ED.

However, EFRAG recognises that there is also support for the alternative view expressed by Ms Françoise Flores in the Basis for Conclusion of the ED. Therefore, EFRAG has decided to ask constituents for their views on the scope of the ED, including a question to better understand which entities issue insurance contracts and are in the scope of the project.

In addition, EFRAG raises some concerns and provides suggestions to the IASB. For example, EFRAG:

  • suggests that the key principles proposed by the IASB in paragraph BC33 of the Basis for Conclusions should encompass cost-benefit considerations;

  • highlights the risks of not considering the existing disclosure requirements in IFRS Standards in the light of BC157 when there are no recognition and measurement differences between IFRS for SMEs and IFRS Standards;

  • suggests that the reasoning for the exceptions is improved;

  • suggests considering the interaction between the disclosure requirements of the ED and the disclosure requirements of the ED Disclosure Requirements in IFRS Standards – A Pilot Approach;

  • considers that the application of a full set of disclosure requirements for IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts can be burdensome and costly for eligible subsidiaries.

  • suggests a number of additional disclosures that it considers relevant for users of financial statements. Nonetheless, EFRAG acknowledges that the assessment of users’ needs in terms of disclosures is difficult and subjective.

EFRAG Comment Letter

In February 2022, EFRAG has published its Final Comment Letter in response to the IASB's ED.

EFRAG recognised the benefits and the support for the IASB's proposals to permit eligible subsidiaries to apply IFRS Standards with reduced disclosure requirements.

European constituents asked for the IASB to consider widening the scope and provided different suggestions. EFRAG acknowledges that there are potential benefits of a broader scope, nonetheless EFRAG also recognises that there is no consensus on whether and to what extent the scope should be widened. Therefore, any decision on the extension of the scope is likely to be challenging and controversial.

Considering this, at this stage, EFRAG supported that the IASB should proceed with its project with the current scope.

Nonetheless, EFRAG recommended that, before the issuance of a new IFRS Standard on reduced disclosures, the IASB clarifies the concept of holding assets in a fiduciary capacity (as insurers, for example, do not in general regard themselves as holding assets in a fiduciary capacity) and, therefore, explores the applicability of the ED to the insurance sector.

EFRAG also believed that the IASB should, in parallel to the finalisation of this project, assess the possibility of extending the proposed benefits to other type of entities (associates, joint ventures, joint operations, not listed banks that are subsidiaries, separate financial statements of ultimate parent entities and all entities without public accountability).

Finally, EFRAG highlighted that the IASB's proposals in this project were likely to put pressure on the definition of 'available for public use' and 'public accountability and welcomes further application guidance on this area.

In addition, EFRAG raised some concerns and provided suggestions on the IASB approach for developing the draft Standard, the proposed structure of the draft Standard, the proposed list of disclosure requirements (including not reducing the disclosure requirements for IFRS 17) and some other topics.

Other Publications

​The ​EFRAG Secretariat issued a Briefing to stimulate debate within Europe and clarify the IASB's discussions on Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures. The views expressed in this Briefing are tentative and reflect the EFRAG Secretariat's understanding of how the IASB's proposals might be applied in the EU. More specifically, the Briefing provides an EU Perspective on the IASB's proposed scope.

The ​EFRAG Secretariat has also issued a second Briefing focused on the compatibility of the Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU with the IASB's ED.  The views expressed in this Briefing are tentative and reflect the EFRAG Secretariat's understanding of whether there are different disclosure requirements in the Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU and the ED and whether there are any disclosures in the Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU that are not required in the IASB’s ED. The Briefing is available here.

Finally, EFRAG issued a Summary of the inputs received from preparers that includes the feedback received from EFRAG's survey "Would you prefer less disclosures for subsidiaries?", which was focused on the costs and benefits and some of the content of the IASB’s proposals. The summary report is available here.

Feedback Statement

In April 2022, EFRAG published its feedback statement. The Feedback Statement summarises the main comments received by EFRAG on its Draft Comment Letter and explains how those comments were considered by EFRAG during its technical discussions leading to the publication of EFRAG’s Final Comment Letter.

Current Stage

The IASB is currently  redeliberating the proposals in its Exposure Draft Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures and EFRAG is actively monitoring the IASB's discussions





Show more...

Documents

Project news